jan koval

coz, zrozumienie slowa pisanego NA PEWNYM POZIOMIE wymaga pewnego poziomu inteligencji............

BINGO!!!! zwlaszcza w trudnych warunkach , oczywiscie tam tak nie bylo, ale jest to jeden z odruchow, ktorych nie powinno sie zmieniac

troszke demonizuja te opisy (ze musisz miec 85 zeby cos tam pojechac) . mysle ze z grizzly jest prosty trick ; nikt nie powie ze kupil narte zbyt wymagajaca, skoro wydal tyle pieniedzy... a co do ac 50 - to narta do wszystkiego. nie odczuwam zeby byla zbyt twarda, jest twarda i solidna i to lubie. przemiezzany snieg, swiezy snieg/puch o i tez przygotowane trasy to tam, gdzie blyszczy. na trasach daje GS-owy feeling. dobrze trzyma na wiekszej szybkosci, nie ma klapania. grizzly lepiej nieco w puchu. ale musi byc szybkosc.....

zupelnie mylne to nie jest naprawa lakotki, to jest reklama stem cells dla naprawy lakotki (nigdy nie udowodnione zeby bylo lepsze od naprawy) zasada jak w PRP pczywiscie nijak sie to ma do discoid meniscus......

jako ze mam teraz troche czasu, z przyjemnoscoa obejrzalem ten film pare minusow z calosci przeswieca reklama kotelnicy oczywiscie w doborze nart ( jedna z najbardzeij kompletnych review) mozna sie nie zgodzic z paroma kwestiami freeride tak samo no i zagadka na koniec w sekcji skitouring - jaki byl popelniony i zademnstrowany PODSTAWOWY blad??? nie mowie o bezpieczenstwie ale wygodzie...... najbardziej wartosciowa czesc - historia - dla mnie przynajmniej

zakladajac, ze to jest prawda ( a ponad 90% tarczowatych jest bocznych) to samo usuniecie oderwanego fragmentu nie wystarczy w operacji musisz osiaganac 3 rzeczy 1/ tzw sauceryzacja czyli doprowadzenie do ksztaltu prawidlowej lakotki 2/ ustabilizowanie lub usniecie czesci uszkodzonej 3/ w koncu ustabilizowanie calej lakotki - prawie kazda tarczowata co najmniej jest niestabilna w czesci tylnej.......,czesto srodkowej, rzadziej przedniej........

sorry, ze w ogole sie odezwalem - ale od czasu do czasu musze zareagowac - tak raz na 6 mies. co do poziomu odpowiedzi na moj post - no comments (przez najblizsze 6 mies)..... Użytkownik jan koval edytował ten post 15 luty 2011 - 04:04

ac 40 184cm. mysle, ze ludzie nie lubia linii ac 4/40/50 bo jest to juz narta wymagajaca. i nie toleruje opieprzania sie. co do glebokiego sniegu - azpewniam, da sie dobrze jezdzic.........

zwykle pierwsze objawy lakotki tarcz wystepuja ok 8-12 rz, zncznie rzadzij 12-18 jezlei jestes dorosly czlowiek, to jest szansa, ze masz tzw typ 2 to ze jest tarczowata, nie znaczy ze ni emoze byc uszkodozna a wrecz pwrzeciwnie - uszkodzenie lak tarcz jest czestsze niz normalnej. i najwazniejsze ; czy jest to przysrodkowa czy boczna czy obie???

a wiesz ze nigdy jeszcze nie mialem mantry ani nikt z mojej najblizszej rodziny? hmmmmm projekt gotowy…..

tutaj dwie nowosci na przyszly sezon od volkl'a (krzysztof te RTM to wlasnie pewnie to o co pytales) volkl generalnie zapowiada nowe modele zwykle modele na 2012 beda mialy bardziej zaznaczony early riser. AC30/50 bedzie wyparte przez RTM (czego nie lubie bo najdluzsza rtm to tylko 181) mantra nowa ma byc jeszcze agresywniejsza a ta nowa aura dla kobiet to juz prawie krolowa glebszego sniegu ponizej pare slow RTM 84 (men’s) Ski dimensions: 129-84-111 Available length of skis: 166;171;176;181 Target market with the featured skis: Top end frontside/all mountain skiers Two sentence description of featured skis: With the advent of new, wider shapes and deep sidecuts came a change in technique - the skier moves more laterally with less weight shift. That’s the big difference with this new ski - the skier has full hook-up when initiating the turn, but the feel is much more smooth so that when it comes across the hill it exits the turn just as effortlessly as it came in, and the skier can keep the flow going down the fall line. Aura (women’s) Ski dimensions: 131-96-114 Available length of skis: 156;163;170 Target market with the featured skis: Female all-conditions/powder skiers Two sentence description of featured skis: For women looking for a fantastic powder ski that can also carve on the groomed, the new Aura features a new, wider 131-96-114 sidecut that floats better in powder. The new tip rocker profile makes the ski more smooth and forgiving no matter what the conditions. What’s on the horizon for next year’s skis? 2011/2012 marks the largest crop of product innovations from Völkl in many years. At the forefront are new models in the Big Mountain and All Mountain freeskiing segments, plus a completely new series of frontside/all-Mountain skis. We’ve also conceived a completely new frontside/carving series to replace the once-popular Tigershark series. With each new model, Völkl enigneers have created the ideal overall set-up, including carefully matching the skis camber profile to the desired performance characteristics. What are three of the biggest forces shaping the changes and developments you’ve made? Consumers are more and more aware of how rocker can improve their skiing experience no matter what the conditions. Wider skis continue to grow in acceptance. Any completely new models (including pro models)? Several new models.. Any disappearing? AC30, AC50 are replaced by the new RTM models

czy w takim razie jestes zona wini'ego??? bo z podtekstu tak wynikaja osobiscie nie mam czasu na szlajanie sie po centrach "testowych".... jezeli zmienie narty 4 razy w ciagu dnia to znaczy ze strace ( w najlepszym przypadku) 1,5h - bo trzeba zmienic wymienic, dostosowac wiazania a poza tym zwykle te budy stoja w miejscach dostepnych dla wszystkich = trzeba zjechac jakims latwym ubitym g..............m, zeby zmienic narty. w ciagu 1,5h moge zrobic np ulubiony zleb pare razy. ale inne rzeczy na nartach...osobiscie dalem w przeszlosci szanse atomic'owi, blizzard'owi, K2, fisher'owi i rossiemu. najgorszy z w/w byl atomic, ale to bylo sporo czasu temu. mam taka nature, ze jak sie zniechece , to trzeba duuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuzo, zeby mnie z powrotem przyciagnac........ wiec od peewnego czasu biore volkl'a i jesscze sie nie zawiodlem. sporadycznie miewam kontakty z wyrobami innych firm i np bandit B4 to zupelna porazka, natomiast stoeckli (ale WC) to z kolei dobre doswiadczenie. podobnie z butami - wiem, ze tzw last tecnica pasuje do budowy moich stop wiec je uzywam......... gdybym spedzal po 100 dni na stoku, moze bym bardziej mieszal. zwykle niesstety wychodzi mi po 35-40 / rok, wiec kazda chwila na stoku jest cenna.................

wini - nie zrozum mnie zle, ale jezeli to tak jest, to wietrze pewne nalecialosci natury psychicznej........... jeszcze raz, nie mysl, ze mowie, ze zona jest psycholem, ale to moze byc jak placebo - widzi napis 155 i juz od razu "odczuwa" roznice.......... zapewniam cie, ze wiecej roznicy sprawi jazda na nieco odmiennie naostrzonej narcie tej sameju dlugosci, niz tak samo naostrzonej dlug 155 vs 150. no chyba ze jest byla zawodniczka.............zachecam do prob.:) Użytkownik jan koval edytował ten post 04 luty 2011 - 02:20

absoluitnie kwestia indywidualnego upodobania. dla mnie np jedyna narta, ktora moge miec oprocz voelkl'a to stoeckli..... ale za malo probowalem innych zeby byc autorytetem w taksonomii porownawczej..........co do koloru ipolaczenia z wiazaniami? na pewno te wiazania pasuja lepiej do GS speedwall - dlatego mam GS-y a nie SL-y :D:D Użytkownik jan koval edytował ten post 04 luty 2011 - 19:15

problem jeden ale za to powaznyPOPRZEDNIE modele nie uwzglednialy SL speedwall, ktory jest zupelnie inna konstrukcja.....

w sumie podoba mi sie twoja riposta, bo lubie ludzi z jajemnatomiast nawet ludzie z jajem nie dostrzega roznicy miedzy 150 i 155. bardzo chetnie bym sie wyrazil co do glownego pytania, ale SL speedwall jest akurat jednym z nielicznych brakujacych ogniw w mojej kolekcji. wiec nie zamierzam pisac o tym, czego nie sprawdzilem.... mialem ochote cos napisac o GS speedwall, ale ze wzgledow zdrowotnych, moge napisac ze wlasnie je odebralem od sprawdzenia wiazan a i wygladaja bardzo ladnie...... natomiast nikna przy kuro..........

rzeczywiscie doskonala rada rozwalic sobie kolano do konca..............

WARTO PRZECZYTAC I STOSOWAC - WIEDZA W PIGULCE przeczytajcie prosze, zwlaszcza ostatni paragraf o najczestszych bledach w podejmowaniu decyzji Avalanches, Part 1: The Basics Most of us pay little attention to avalanches unless someone gets injured or killed in one. Be smart. Whether you go snowboarding, skiing, snowshoeing or climbing, learn all you can about avalanches so that you don't end up on the wrong side of a slide. The sad fact is that most people caught in an avalanche trigger the slide themselves by traveling on or beneath unstable snow slopes. Typical avalanche victims are usually very skilled in their sport, but have little knowledge or skills for dealing with avalanches. REI’s 4–part series of articles provides some basic information you need to know. The Potential Hazards An avalanche can go as fast as 120 miles per hour, a force that can easily sweep you into trees and rocks, pull you over cliffs and tangle you in your ski or snowboard equipment. Nearly one–third of avalanche deaths are the result of trauma. If you survive the trauma, you then have to deal with a mass of concrete–like snow encasing your body. What may start as powder snow heats up from the friction of sliding downhill, melts slightly and then refreezes solidly around you. The weight of this crud is often enough to force the air out of your lungs. If you have been able to form a breathing space before the snow settles, you may have a decent chance of survival. That assumes all members of your party are wearing avalanche transceivers and know how to use them. From here, it's a race against time. Most people can't survive under snow much more than 30 minutes (the Black Diamond AvaLung can extend this time to about an hour), so becoming proficient with an avalanche transceiver, probe and shovel is a must for winter backcountry travel. About 70% of avalanche fatalities are due to suffocation. The best defense, however, is to know how to read snow conditions and terrain and to avoid dangerous situations altogether. Types of Avalanches Loose–snow Avalanches Loose–snow avalanches occur where there is little or no cohesion in the snowpack. They usually start at a point on or near the surface and gather more snow and momentum as they progress down the slope, often forming a triangular–shaped path. Snow clumps falling onto the slope from a cliff above can set off these slides, as can melting within the snowpack. These avalanches can occur in dry or wet snow, in winter or summer. Winter loose–snow avalanches usually happen during or after snowstorms. In warmer months, wet loose–snow avalanches are usually the result of meltwater or rain. Either type can be dangerous. Slab Avalanches Even more dangerous are slab avalanches, in which a layer of snow breaks away from the layer beneath it and slides downhill. Most backcountry travelers are caught in these avalanches. Slab avalanches are the result of many snowstorms or strong winds depositing layers of snow that change over time. Some layers settle and become stronger, while others grow weaker. Weak layers are frequently grainy or fluffy so that other layers can't bond to them. An avalanche results when the top layer of snow, known as a slab, is not bonded well to the underlying layer and is disturbed by some kind of trigger, often a skier or climber. Rather than starting at a point on the surface, as loose–snow avalanches do, slab avalanches start out bigger and deeper, usually at a fracture line running across the top of the slide. Contributing Factors to Avalanches Terrain Slope angle: Pay attention to slope angles when you're skiing or climbing, since avalanches occur most frequently on slopes between 30 and 45 degrees. A clinometer on a compass or one specifically made for snowpack study can be a useful tool when traveling in the backcountry. Slope aspect: During winter, a south–facing slope is more stable than a north–facing one since it has sun exposure to melt and condense the snow. The tempting north–facing slopes that hold all the best powder are also more likely to have unstable layers of ’depth hoar,’ the dry, icy snow that does not stick to the adjacent layers. Since these slopes don't have the benefit of sun to warm and compact the snow over the winter, they tend to be less stable than south–facing slopes. By spring and early summer, however, a south–facing slope can mean more serious melting, resulting in dangerous wet–snow slides. The warmer weather in these seasons often allows the snow on north–facing slopes to consolidate, thus making them safer. Terrain hazards: Snowpack is likely to be unstable on convex slopes, cliff bands, boulders or trees where the snowpack breaks, wind–loaded lee slopes or beneath cornices. It's best to avoid bowls, cirques and depressions where snow could settle after a slide. Steep, narrow couloirs (or gullies) tend to collect snow and present a trap to hikers or skiers caught in them, often without side escape routes if their sides are steep. See Avalanches, Part 3: Reducing Risk for tips on what terrain is usually safest. Weather Precipitation: Snow is least stable during or immediately after a snowfall or rainstorm. Large amounts of snow falling in a short time are a likely sign that the snowpack could slide. A heavy snowfall of especially wet or dense snow over lighter powder snow can set up layers of instability. Rain tends to percolate down through the snowpack and warm the deeper snow. It also provides lubrication between layers, making them more likely to slide. Wind: Wind is another indicator of snow instability. Often, high winds pick up surface snow on one slope and deposit it on the other side of the ridge (a so–called ’wind slab’) where it is prone to slides. Pay attention to the intensity and direction of the wind throughout the day. Temperature: Temperature fluctuations cause a number of problems with snowpack stability. Temperature differences between the ground and new layers of snow, between different layers of snow, or even between the air and the top layer of snow, can cause changes in snow crystal formation. A common crystal type that is particularly dangerous due to its inability to bond with other snow crystals is know as ’hoar.’ Hoar snow, also called ’sugar snow’ because of its similarity to granulated sugar, can be found at any depth or at multiple depths in a deep snowpack. Another common temperature problem, especially in the spring, is rapid warming of a slope, which can lead to wet–snow avalanches. Snowpack Snowstorms pile up one after the other all winter long. Wind blows snow off of some slopes and on to others. Temperature changes cause snow crystals to metamorphose. If the snow’s consistency remains constant, the snowpack is homogenous and stable. It’s when the snowpack develops different layers of different snow types that it becomes unstable and hazardous. It is extremely important for the backcountry traveler (especially on slopes between 30 and 45 degrees) to take the time to analyze the layers of the snowpack and test their stability. Human Factors While terrain, weather and snowpack play a huge role in contributing to the likelihood of an avalanche, it is also important to recognize that ego, emotions and group–think can cloud your judgment and impair your decision–making ability. In fact, according to a recent survey of Canadian avalanche professionals, respondents identified ’human factors’ and ’choice of terrain’ as the leading causes of avalanche accidents. Some common decision–making mistakes: Familiar terrain: You may be more likely to take risks in terrain that you are familiar with. Conditions, however, can change minute–to–minute, so treat all terrain like it is the first time you have seen it. Acceptance: Approval from the group can be a strong force. Pushing on because you do not want to go against the will of the group, even though things do not feel right, can lead to unnecessary risk. Overcommitment: If you are overcommitted to your destination, you may block out your better judgment or ignore indications of danger by focusing only on achieving your goal. In mountaineering, this is known as ’summit fever.’ ’Expert halo’: This can occur when you perceive that someone else in the group has more experience than you, based on his or her having been in the area before or other backcountry education. While this may be true, it is better to ask than to just assume. Existing tracks: Relying on an existing set of tracks in the snow can give a false sense of security. Just because someone else went through the area before you does not mean it is safe for you to travel through. Powder fever: It is very tempting to ignore avalanche hazards when the snow is deep, fresh and untracked. Social proof: It can be easy to succumb to the ’herding instinct’ and step onto a dangerous slope when other people have gone before you. Always assess the situation as if you were traveling alone. Speak up if things do not feel right. Użytkownik jan koval edytował ten post 30 styczeń 2011 - 15:56

ja odpuscilem caly sezon zeby byc gotowym na nast (interesujaco by wygladal strus z glwoa w sniegu nie uwazasz???)? problemem jest ze mozesz sobie dolozyc i cos, co moglo byc cacy po operacji moze wymagac czegos bardziej zlozonego lub zwiekszy szanse na zmiany zwtrodnieniowe stawu….

oczywqiscie polemizowac zawsze przytoczylas nazwisko bardzo do brze znane w ortopedii (Scarpa) , tutaj widzisz jak jedna litera moze zmienic wszystko Scarf - jak najbardziej co do nazwy - to schorzenie nie nazywa sie "ostroga pietowa" nazywa sie "plantar fascitis" wielu pacjentow ma ostroge na zdjeciach ale to nie ostroga wywoluje bol - rownoczesnie tyle samo klientow ma ostrogi nie majac plantar fascitis >>>>>>korelacja ostrogi = bol jest BLEDNA natomiast korelacja haglund-rentgen jest Użytkownik jan koval edytował ten post 30 styczeń 2011 - 16:51

rtg nic nie da, chyba ze poytwierdzi haglund'a. obecnosc czy nie klasycznych "ostrog: nie ma nic wpsolnego z bolem BTW operacja scarpy - znam taka do hallux rigidus ale nie w hallux valgus (czyli paluch koslawy)????

ale przeciez chemik nabyl klocki do przodu a wg opisu piszczaly Z TYLU!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! wiec ciemno widze wyjazd jutro rano!!!!!!!!!!!11 Użytkownik chemik edytował ten post 28 styczeń 2011 - 19:52 Tak długi cytat nie jest potrzebny... Wszyscy wiedzą o co chodzi...

gratuluje "doskonalej" decyzji - coz nie ma to jak postawa strusia......................

przepraszam to byl zart - taka przerobka nazw preparatow do gore-tex'u................ sorry (smile)

najlepsze do prania spodni z pianki sa nast preparaty FoamRevivex (TradeMark) TronFoam ™ albo w ostatecznosci DWR